9 Strategies to Combat Voter Suppression

Voter suppression refers to practices intended to disenfranchise specific groups, thereby influencing electoral outcomes. Unlike legitimate political campaigning meant to persuade, voter suppression seeks to reduce turnout among targeted demographics, often marginalized communities, and includes tactics such as restrictive voter ID laws, limiting polling locations, and spreading misinformation.

This nefarious practice represents a real danger to democratic participation by undermining fair representation and the legitimacy of electoral processes. When certain groups are systematically discouraged or prevented from voting, it skews the will of the electorate and erodes public trust in governance. The impact is profound, potentially leading to the disenfranchisement of large segments of the population, particularly minorities, the poor, the young, and the elderly.

Examples of Voter Suppression

In Nigeria's 2023 general elections, voter suppression was evident in several regions. For instance, in Borno State, members of the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF) were reportedly used by some politicians to intimidate opponents and commit electoral violence. This led to a significant number of eligible voters being discouraged from participating in the electoral process, undermining the integrity of the elections.

During the Brazilian general elections in 2022, there were attempts to suppress votes by reducing public transportation services and increasing roadblocks in lower-income areas, making it more difficult for residents to reach polling stations. These tactics disproportionately targeted poorer communities, raising concerns about the fairness of the electoral process.

In the 2011 Canadian federal elections, voters received misleading robocalls falsely informing them of changes to their polling stations. Investigations revealed that such fraud had occurred and was likely perpetrated by individuals with access to the Conservative Party’s voter database. While the exact impact on election outcomes was undetermined, the incidents highlighted vulnerabilities in the electoral system.

What Strategies Can Help

1.     Voter Education and Assistance Platforms. Educational platforms play a crucial role in informing voters about their rights and the voting process. Organizations like Vote Riders in the United States provide comprehensive information on voter ID requirements across different states and offer assistance in obtaining necessary identification. Collaborations with tech companies such as Facebook and Snapchat help integrate voter ID information into widely used platforms, increasing reach and effectiveness.

2.     Election Monitoring and Reporting Tools. Mobile applications and online platforms enable voters to report irregularities or instances of suppression in real time. These tools allow election monitoring organizations to respond promptly to issues like malfunctioning voting machines, intimidation at polling stations, or the spread of false information, thereby safeguarding electoral integrity.

3.     Digital Voter Registration and Verification. Transitioning to digital voter registration systems simplifies the process, reduces errors, and increases accessibility. Online platforms allow citizens to register or update their information conveniently, minimizing bureaucratic hurdles. A growing number of countries like Estonia, Australia and Canada have implemented online voter registration systems, resulting in higher voter engagement and reduced administrative burdens.

4.     Mobile Voting Applications. Mobile technology can enhance voting accessibility, especially for individuals unable to visit polling stations due to distance, disability, or other constraints. Mobile voting applications enable secure, remote voting, significantly benefiting overseas citizens and military personnel. These apps can also provide real-time updates and notifications, keeping voters informed about the process and deadlines. They often integrate robust identity verification tools to ensure that only eligible voters participate, thereby maintaining electoral integrity. Moreover, continuous advancements in encryption and blockchain technologies further enhance the security and trustworthiness of mobile voting systems.

      Estonia serves as a prime example of how digital and mobile voting can be successfully implemented. Since 2005, Estonia has allowed citizens to cast ballots online using secure digital ID cards, demonstrating that mobile and internet voting can broaden accessibility while upholding rigorous security standards. This pioneering approach has contributed to higher voter engagement and has set a benchmark for other countries exploring similar systems.

5.     Combating Misinformation with Artificial Intelligence. Misinformation can deter or mislead voters, effectively suppressing turnout. Artificial intelligence can help identify and counteract false information by monitoring social media platforms and flagging misleading content. During election periods, platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook could employ AI algorithms to detect and label false information, helping users discern credible information from deceptive content.

6.     Transportation Assistance through Ride-Sharing Partnerships. Limited transportation access can prevent voters, particularly in rural or underserved areas, from reaching polling stations. Partnerships between voter advocacy groups and ride-sharing companies can help alleviate this barrier. For instance, VoteRiders has collaborated with companies such as Lyft and Uber to offer discounted or free rides to polling stations, ensuring that transportation issues do not impede voting.

7.     Accessible Voting Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities. Technological advancements have led to the development of assistive voting devices that accommodate individuals with disabilities. Tools such as ballot-marking devices and audio ballots ensure that voters with visual or other impairments can vote independently and privately, reducing barriers to participation.

8.     Secure Remote Voting Options. For voters who cannot physically attend polling stations, secure remote voting options—such as mail-in ballots or online voting platforms—offer alternative means of participation. Robust authentication and encryption measures ensure that these remote voting methods remain secure and trustworthy.

9.     Data Analytics for Resource Allocation. Data analytics can identify regions with historically low voter turnout or areas experiencing targeted suppression tactics. Election officials and advocacy groups can then allocate resources effectively, deploying additional polling stations, providing targeted voter education, or monitoring for potential suppression activities.

Voter suppression remains a critical issue that threatens the foundations of democracy by disenfranchising specific groups and distorting electoral outcomes. Addressing this challenge requires a multifaceted approach: vigilant protection of voting rights, robust legal frameworks, public awareness campaigns, and the strategic application of technology.

By enhancing accessibility, providing accurate information, ensuring vote integrity, and facilitating participation, technological innovations can play a pivotal role in safeguarding democratic processes and ensuring that every eligible citizen can exercise their right to vote.

2024: Super-Cycle Election Year Draws Huge Voter Turnout. Here’s Why.

 

In 2024, over 80 countries held national elections, making it the largest election year in history.  These exercises were conducted across continents and included major democracies such as India, the United States, and Indonesia, which represent nearly half of the world’s population. 

The record high volume of elections also accentuated both the resilience and challenges of democratic processes worldwide. While most countries managed to transfer power peacefully, others faced political unrest and disputes over election integrity. The outcomes of these elections have had lasting impacts on both national and international political landscapes.

One standout trait of the 2024 election cycle was the impressive voter turnout across the globe, with many countries seeing participation levels that either matched or exceeded historical averages. Despite concerns about democratic backsliding, political disengagement, and voter suppression, millions of people showed up at the polls, proving that elections still matter. The latest data from International IDEA reveals several key factors that contributed to this trend.

Europe: A Steady Turnout

While electoral participation in Europe has been on a slow decline for the past two decades, countries like Iceland and Austria recorded voter turnouts well above 70% in 2024. Even the European Parliament elections, which often do not see great voter enthusiasm, maintained a steady 50% turnout, signaling that voters across the continent continue to take their democratic responsibilities seriously. This level of engagement suggests that institutional trust is coming back, and many citizens starting to believe again in the power of their vote.

Asia: Mixed Participation Across the Region

Asia painted a more varied picture, with some countries recording impressive participation rates while others remained at moderate levels. Indonesia stood out with a remarkable 70% turnout, showing strong public interest in the electoral process. Meanwhile, Japan and South Korea saw turnout rates in the 50-60% range, reflecting stable but not necessarily enthusiastic voter engagement. The differences across the region highlight how political climates, election stakes, and voter mobilization efforts influence participation.

North America: High-Stakes Elections Drive Turnout

Deep political divisions marked the 2024 US elections, which led to relatively high turnout. Approximately 65% of eligible voters participated, a slight increase from previous election cycles. The highly polarized atmosphere and widespread efforts to increase voter access likely contributed to this rise. Similarly, Mexico recorded a 64% turnout, demonstrating consistent democratic participation despite political challenges.

South America: One of the Highest Turnout Regions

South America saw some of the strongest voter turnouts globally. Uruguay led with over 80% participation, reaffirming its status as one of the most engaged electorates. Brazil and Panama also maintained strong turnout rates between 60% and 70%, reflecting the region’s deep-rooted democratic traditions. Compulsory voting laws in several South American countries play a major role in sustaining high participation levels, but cultural and historical factors also contribute to a strong sense of civic duty among voters.

Africa: High Engagement in Some Areas, Moderate in Others

Africa saw both strong engagement and regional disparities. Botswana and Namibia recorded voter turnouts of around 70%, showing that democratic engagement remains a priority for many citizens. Meanwhile, Madagascar and Mozambique’s turnout ranged between 50% and 60%, which, while moderate, still signals a level of public participation that many democracies would envy. Political stability, electoral transparency, and voter access continue to influence participation rates across the continent.

Oceania: Steady and Reliable Participation

Voter turnout remained stable in Oceania, with nations like the Solomon Islands and Kiribati reporting participation rates near 60%. Despite logistical challenges and small populations, citizens in the region remain committed to the democratic process, ensuring that elections continue to reflect the will of the people.

Middle East: Political Context Shapes Turnout

The Middle East saw moderate voter participation, with Kuwait recording a 50% turnout. However, turnout across the region varied significantly due to differing political structures, electoral freedoms, and voter motivations. Some countries continue to experience restrictions that limit meaningful political engagement, which inevitably affects turnout figures.

Global Average Turnout: A Stable 61%

Despite concerns over authoritarian regression and other challenges, the global average voter turnout in 2024 was 61%, comparable to past years. While some elections saw record-breaking numbers, others followed historical patterns. However, not all elections were without controversy. The annulment of Romania’s 2024 election significantly affected regional turnout statistics, raising concerns about political stability. Algeria, despite reporting moderate turnout, remains classified as “not free”, highlighting the complexities of voter engagement in restricted democracies.

The Impact of Legal Frameworks on Voter Turnout

Countries with compulsory voting laws, such as Belgium (85%) and Uruguay (80%+), continue to demonstrate how policy choices shape electoral participation. Even in the U.S. (65%), legal frameworks that expand voting access—such as early voting and mail-in ballots—have helped sustain engagement.

The 2024 elections proved that when voters believe their votes matter, they turn out in large numbers. Whether driven by high-stakes elections, strong democratic traditions, or well-designed legal frameworks, voter turnout remained strong worldwide. It remains to be seen how voter engagement will hold up in the coming years in the face of the many challenges faced by democracies.

Delayed Postal Ballots Inhibit UK Overseas Votes; Estonia’s Online System Shines as an Example

 

In the recent UK General Election, tens of thousands of overseas voters faced disenfranchisement due to delays in receiving their postal ballots. A survey by New Europeans UK, Unlock Democracy, and the British Overseas Voters Forum revealed that less than half (46%) of those surveyed managed to return their ballots on time. The issue was prevalent even in countries with efficient postal systems such as France, where only 55% of the respondents received their ballots in time. 191,338 overseas voters were registered for the 2024 general election.

The findings of the survey presented to the UK Parliament were disheartening. Many Britons abroad reported receiving their postal ballots well after the election had concluded, rendering their votes useless. The inefficiency was particularly egregious in countries like Australia, where only 6% of voters eligible to vote from abroad managed to get their vote counted. Some overseas voters resorted to traveling to the UK or using expensive courier services to ensure their votes were counted.

Efforts to modernize the voting process for overseas Britons have been discussed. Recommendations include extending the election period and allowing citizens to vote at UK Embassies or High Commissions. However, these measures might only bring minimal improvements. Online voting stands out as the most viable solution to this recurring problem.

UK lawmakers would do well to study the successful implementation of online voting in Estonia. Since 2005, Estonian voters have been able to cast their ballots online from anywhere in the world. The system has proved to be efficient, secure, and highly inclusive, drastically increasing voter participation among citizens living abroad.

Estonia's success serves as a valuable example and highlights the need for the UK to modernize its voting systems to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their location, can effectively exercise their right to vote. The technology required for secure online voting is available and has been successfully implemented. There is no valid excuse for the UK not to adopt similar measures to prevent the disenfranchisement of its overseas citizens.

The UK government must urgently address the inefficiencies in the current postal voting system and consider the introduction of secure electronic voting. By doing so, they can ensure that every citizen's vote counts, regardless of where they are in the world.

Conspiracy Against Common Sense: How Wild Theories Derail Electoral Reform

 

Disinformation and misinformation around elections are leading policymakers in Canada to make erroneous decisions. Conspiracy theories targeting electronic voting equipment are putting undue pressure on politicians, resulting in misguided initiatives that undermine the accuracy and efficiency of elections, rather than advancing meaningful reforms.

In Calgary, Alberta, for instance, some officials have proposed reverting to manual counting of ballots. This knee-jerk reaction is rooted in conspiracy theories about the security of electronic voting systems. Fueled by fears of fraud and misinformation, this sentiment exemplifies the dangerous trend of abandoning proven efficient technologies for outdated methods that have been repeatedly shown to be less accurate and more prone to error.

Hand-counting is often romanticized as a return to simplicity but has been proven to be less accurate, more resource-intensive, and far slower. The belief in hand-counting’s superiority over machine tabulation is not only unfounded but also dangerous, diverting attention from genuine vulnerabilities in the electoral system.

Research from MIT and the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project has demonstrated the superior accuracy of optical scanners over manual ballot counting. The MIT study found that the error rate for ballots counted by optical scanners was around 0.5%, compared to approximately 0.9% for hand-counted ballots. Similarly, the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project highlighted that optical scanners significantly reduce discrepancies between initial counts and recounts, ensuring more reliable results. These findings underscore the effectiveness of optical scanners in improving the accuracy of ballot counting.

Beyond accuracy, the efficiency of electronic tabulators is indispensable. In the United States, where ballots often span dozens of races and propositions, hand-counting would create logistical nightmares. Counting such complex ballots manually would require weeks or even months, delaying results and fostering uncertainty. Furthermore, in the vacuum left by delayed counts, candidates and commentators could exploit the situation, sowing further doubt about the legitimacy of the outcomes. Tabulators, on the other hand, deliver timely results that align with public expectations and preserve trust in the process.

The financial and logistical strain of hand-counting cannot be overstated. Many jurisdictions have not used manual counting in decades and lack the infrastructure to pivot back. Training and deploying the necessary workforce would be a monumental challenge, especially amid ongoing poll worker shortages. One analysis estimated that counting 90,000 ballots manually in a single day would require 1,200 workers—an unsustainable and costly prospect for most municipalities.

A 2023 study by Arizona’s Mohave County Elections Department found that hand-counting the 2024 general election results would require 245 people working 19 eight-hour days, which would cost about $521,000. Accounting for other expenses such as security guards, cameras and additional staff, the study estimated hand-counts for both the 2024 primary and general elections would cost the county $1.1 million.

The push to abandon tabulators in favor of hand-counting is a step backward, driven by myths rather than evidence. The proposal in Calgary to abandon electronic tabulation exemplifies how such decisions, based on misinformation, can undermine trust in the electoral process.

By confronting conspiracy theories with facts and embracing evidence-based solutions, we can protect the foundations of democracy. Elections should inspire confidence, not controversy—and that begins with common sense prevailing over baseless suspicion.